MPs back changes to social care cap

Boris Johnson has succeeded in MP backing of his social care cap for England, despite opposition from within the Conservative party.

The government has won a vote in the House of Commons, with a majority of 26, to make changes to social care cost cap proposals. The proposals have however been widely criticised because they could disproportionately affect less wealthy members of society.

Under the plans, means-tested council support payments will be excluded from a new £86,000 lifetime limit on costs, which the Prime Minister insists will be more generous than the current system, calling it “progressive” and “much better” than the existing one.

Under the existing system nobody gets any support if they have assets of £23,000 or more – now you get support if you have £100,000 or less, so we’re helping people … we’re addressing a longstanding social injustice and it will benefit the people of this country,” he said.

The cap will cover fees for personal care, like help with washing and dressing, but will not cover living costs such as care home fees, food or utility bills.

Under the government’s wider social care plan, from October 2023 those with assets of less than £20,000 will not have to pay towards care fees (although they might have to pay from their income) and those with assets between £20,000 and £100,000 will qualify for council help, but will have to pay £86,000 out of their own pocket to reach the cap. Finally, those with more than £100,000 in assets will not receive any financial help from the council.

Labour deputy leader, Angela Rayner, said that the government had “broken their promise“:

Tonight Conservative MPs voted to break their promise that nobody would have to sell their homes to pay for their social care costs and voted to hammer poorer pensions to protect millionaires in mansions. It’s an inheritance tax on the north and a con, not a social care plan.

Sally Warren, policy director at the King’s Fund health think tank, also criticised the plan, stating that:

The change to the social care cap is a regressive step that will leave people with low levels of wealth still exposed to very high care costs.

It is likely to mean that some people with moderate assets living in poorer areas will still be forced to sell their home to pay for their care, while wealthier people from richer parts of the country will be protected from this“, she said.

The Act will now pass to the House of Lords for debate and amendments before it returns to the Commons for final votes.

Thy Will Be done have been saying for years that there is no way any legislation that is bought in will either be fair or be able to guarantee that you will not need to sell your home to pay for your care. The ONLY way is to set up a property Trust at a time when:

  1. Care was not a consideration

  2. When you had not been diagnosed with any condition that you could reasonably expect would mean you may need care in the future

  3. Where you had reasons OTHER than preventing using your home to pay for care to set up the Trust 

  1. such as wanting to ensure of your spouse remarried after your death and then died before their new spouse or divorced that the estate you left them would not be lost to the future spouse but be protected for your children

  2. Wanting to ensure that should any of your children divorce or go bankrupt after inheriting that their inheritance would be secure

Contact us now to find out how you can protect your property going forwards.

0800 668 11 64

Thy Will Be Done

Where there’s a Will there’s a WAY!

Previous
Previous

Property Trusts - 8 reasons to organise a Property Trust

Next
Next

Thy Will Be Done (Spain) Ltd awarded HIGHLY COMMENDED accolade in the finals of the The British Wills and Probate Awards for the 2nd year running in the Category BEST WILL WRITING FIRM (south)